This week I am going to do a reflection about the Next
Generation Standards (NGSS). NGSS are a group of standards created with a clear
objective that encourage students in all their educational phases to look into
Science as an interesting field that can be part of their lives. Having new
standards would help not only students but also teachers to better understand
how science can be applied in all daily activities and how science can be an
exciting career for more and more students every year.
Despite the state educational standards, the NGSS are
looking to complement them (State standards) to give students the opportunity
to experiment Science and engineering embedded in their real contexts. In this
way besides of having only the theoretical knowledge, hands-on experiences give
students the opportunity to relate all the different aspects of their lives
with the power of Science and engineering.
But why new standards? Technology has evolved and exists in
all fields. Every single day new experiments and procedures are created to
enhance human’s life and to better understand our world. However, there are a
lot of students that have misconceptions about Science education. According to Gormally
(2016) students relate a scientist as lonely persons who use lab coats and who
know everything. This image is the image of science that NGSS are looking to
change in the minds of students.
Having new standards will allow schools all over the country
to change the stereotype of science as boring and unreachable. Having new
standards in this information era then, will allow students to have a different
perspective of what is to do science.
An interesting aspect of the NGSS is that the standards are
constructed around three dimensions: the type of practices that can be applied in
the classroom, the crosscut concepts that can be applied in different science
areas and are used in the standards, and the connection with the disciplinary core
ideas that allow students to have enough knowledge to expand their knowledge. Another
interesting aspect is that NGSS create relations between practice, content and
the connections created from them.
It is important to emphasize that NGSS give teachers
flexibility to apply them in their classes. The standards include goals and a
guide of progression that students should acquire in the different school
levels, this goals are stated and explained to avoid confusions in their
application in the classrooms.
One more feature of NGSS is the addition of different
appendixes that explain all the different aspects considered in their creation,
like implementation, core ideas progression, engineering design, the connection
of NGSS with the common core standards for literacy in science and technical
subjects, etc. This features can help teachers to better understand what are
the expectations for each grade level and to plan the better way to achieve
them in class. In sum, having new standards is an excellent way to develop more
research and the opportunity to create more exciting practices in science
classes, in which students have the opportunity to apply science in their lives
not only as part of a class but maybe as a career plan.
References
Gormally, C. & Marchut, A. (2016). "Science isn't my thing" Exploring non-science majors' science identities. Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
References
Gormally, C. & Marchut, A. (2016). "Science isn't my thing" Exploring non-science majors' science identities. Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Hello Diana,
ResponderEliminarFor optimal learning and instruction to take place in the classroom, there must be an advanced set of standards. As time evolves so does the desire to better understand of the world we live in. You have made a great insight into how the NGSS comes into play and why it is important; which is for the sole purpose of technology advancing and existing in all science fields as well as to change students misconceptions about science. Unfortunately there are many students who have the wrong misconception of science and develop attitudes toward the STEM subjects. You mentioned that NGSS would change stereotypes of science, to further clarify that point you could have mention a stereotype or how NGSS changes that stereotype. How would NGSS provide a different perspective?
Este comentario ha sido eliminado por el autor.
ResponderEliminarGood Evening Diana,
ResponderEliminarI appreciate that you both reliably summarized the article while also providing a clear view of your own positive feelings on NGSS. You cleaning blend recitation of facts and editorializing on the subject.
In your first paragraph, your present evidence that students stereotypically view scientist as “lonely persons who use lab coats” and express concern that this means students view science as boring. However, I don’t think one can confidently make that logical leap, as it requires one to conflate scientist and science. Opinions on one do not necessary translate to the other. For example, a person’s stereotypical view of professional musicians might be alcoholic, sex-crazed, drug addicts, but that does not mean they do not appreciate music.
Of course, musicians and scientist are not a perfect comparison. So, do you think that a negative view of scientist necessarily means a negative view of science?
-SFM
Buenas Diana,
EliminarI agree with you that science in itself needs to be presented in a more hands-on environment where students do not get drilled with the traditional drill and kill curriculum of the past. Theoretical learning may be find and dandy for PhD students, whom may not disagree that even at that level, it is somewhat difficult to apply the learned theory. I have found myself applying almost every theoretical aspect of the TLC into my teaching profession, which is why I have been able to understand the theory we learn. K-12 students do not have the ability to practice Newton's laws of force and thus it is through hands-on application that a "Newton" will make sense to them not only by audio instruction, but visual and tactile as well. With this in mind, I wanted to ask you if you know enough about the Common Core Curriculum that they actually apply this type of learning with students? It's something I'm willing to research and even apply in my mathematics courses.
steve
Hi Diana, I agree with your first statement that it is important for both students and teachers to understand that science have clear objectives which can lead to start students’ being encouraged and look at science is not only an interesting field but one which can, and is part of their lives. I believe that science education has been removed from students’ focus by being too theory laden which involves memorizing a lot of facts and less hands-on. It is my opinion that students learn much better by being actively involved in a hands-on process than by memorizing important theories and facts. What do you think will be the hardest obstacle to implement Generation Science Standards?
ResponderEliminarSincerely,
Cameron Wilson